June 23, 2023

US Supreme Court ruled against Alabama’s violation of the Black voters rights

Article link copied.

slide image

Allen vs Milligan press conference, October 4, 2022.

Picture by: The Legal Defense Fund | Facebook

On June 8, the US Supreme Court decided in favour of Black voters in the state of Alabama, who challenged the map of Congress voting districts drawn by the Republican majority in the state legislature.

The Supreme Court ruled that the state violated the law prohibiting racial discrimination and diluted the voting power of Alabama’s Black residents. It found that only one out of seven districts had a Black majority of people who can vote despite the Black population accounting for a quarter of the state’s population.

Civil rights campaigners, such as the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) and others suggested several changes to Alabama’s state legislature so the congressional electoral map would include the second Black voters majority district.

The court’s decision was a surprise. It was narrowly voted through (five votes to four) as a result of one of the Republican-nominated justices, Brett Kavanaugh, siding with three Democrat-nominees and Chief Justice John Roberts.

Judges summed up that state lawmakers should have drawn another district “in which Black voters either comprise a voting-age majority or something quite close to it.”

The opposition to the decision adopted by the Supreme Court was led by Justice Clarence Thomas, who argued that the Voting Rights Act does not support the position that Alabama had ‘to intentionally redraw its longstanding congressional districts so that black voters can control a number of seats roughly proportional to the black share of the State’s population.’

“The law demands no such thing, and, if it did, the Constitution would not permit it,” he argued.

Civil rights groups were preparing for a loss in the Supreme Court where Republican appointees now hold a majority. “Alabama attempted to rewrite federal law by saying race had no place in redistricting,” said Deuel Ross, who argued on the side of the plaintiffs. “But because of the state’s sordid and well-documented history of racial discrimination, race must be used to remedy that past and ensure communities of color are not boxed out of the electoral process.”

Alabama’s Attorney General Steve Marshall said: “The State is still entitled to put on our full case at trial, and we are confident that the evidence will make clear that voters in Alabama, regardless of their race, have the same opportunity as any other members of the electorate to participate in the State’s political processes and elect representatives of their choice.”

This particular ruling is a textbook example for similar cases in Louisiana, Texas and Georgia, where plaintiffs are suing the state to include additional Black voting-age majority electoral districts.

Written by:


Mykyta Yaremenko


Kyiv, Ukraine | Wrocław, Poland

Born in 2006 in Kyiv, Mykyta now lives in Wrocław, experiencing his high school years in one of the city’s international schools. Like many other Ukrainians, he left his hometown of Kyiv at the beginning of 2022 when Russia attacked Ukraine and moved to Poland, marking the start of his new journey.

In the future, he hopes to participate in the fields of politics and international relations. Currently, Mykyta engages in reading various articles about the history of politics and plans to resume his debate career.

He speaks Ukrainian, Russian, and English while actively learning Polish.

Edited by:


Aleksandra Lasek

Human Rights Section Editor

Warsaw, Poland


Create an account to continue reading

A free account will allow you to bookmark your favourite articles and submit an entry to the Harbinger Prize 2024.

You can also sign up for the Harbingers’ Weekly Brief newsletter.